🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold move to ban social networking access for those under 16 is creating waves around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and parents are observing closely to see if this strategy will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing group of states are moving toward similar bans.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that phones and networks are "stealing our youngsters' youth". Legislation is expected to be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media participants. The media minister have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "a potential tools in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked lawmakers to pass a law increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a comparable move, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has recommended families to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has approved a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is given. While it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a useful first step," stated the European lawmaker behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Approach

In the UK, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but insisting any action must be "supported by conclusive research".

Earlier, support grew behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the administration vowed to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have voiced apprehensions. One foundation established by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after viewing disturbing social media material argues that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of harm when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to build products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, regulation is mostly unfolding at the state government level against a backdrop of country-wide gridlock.

• Utah requires parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill banning children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra access needing a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced laws requiring parental consent for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from certain figures to follow Australia's path, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Views

Apart from Europe and the US, additional countries are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, global agencies adopt a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "may even backfire". The body points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for marginalized children and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this global debate evolves, the steps of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers around the world are increasingly content to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.